Skip to content
Rio de Janeiro · São Paulo · Salvador — matters across Brazil
Bruno Marcelos — Escritório de Advocacia

Pauta Regulatória · Daily brief

No. 256

Automatically translated from the Portuguese edition, which prevails in case of discrepancy. Ler em português

Federal Official Gazette

No updates.

ANS news

No updates.

Open public consultations

  • CP 178. Subject: preliminary recommendations against the incorporation of somatrogon and cabozantinib levomalate. Deadline: from October 7 to October 26, 2026
  • CP 179. Subject: proposed update of Normative Instruction ANS – IN ANS No. ANS No. 31, of December 19, 2022, which governs the monitoring and assessment of the guarantee of care for beneficiaries by health care plan operators. Deadline: from Oct 23, 2026 to Dec 7, 2026

Scheduled public hearings

There are no scheduled public hearings.

Open public calls for input

There are no scheduled public hearings.

Open public calls

There are no open public calls or targeted social participation procedures.

Other news

STJ – Repetitive Topic No. 1,211: age-based price adjustment in group life insurance

The Second Section of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) set the thesis that an age-based adjustment of the premium in group life insurance is valid where there is an express contractual provision and prior notice to the insured at renewals, subject to the rules of Susep and the Conselho Nacional de Seguros Privados. The judgment covered Special Appeals No. 1,887,666/SC and No. 1,926,108/SC and was concluded unanimously on Oct 8, 2026. It was published in Case-Law Bulletin (Informativo de Jurisprudência) No. 906. The STJ also rejected the analogical application of Article 15 of Law No. 9,656/1998 and of Article 15, § 3, of the Statute of the Elderly (Estatuto da Pessoa Idosa) to life insurance. Analysis: this is a repetitive precedent concerning group life insurance, and not private health care plans. The decision does not change ANS rules or the regime of age-based price adjustments for health plans. The distinction expressly established by the STJ is relevant to avoid the automatic transposition of rules specific to supplementary health to contracts subject to insurance regulation.

https://scon.stj.jus.br/jurisprudencia/externo/informativo/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Sources: Federal Official Gazette (DOU) and the ANS website. Press items link to the original article. This brief is for information only and does not constitute legal advice.